-
January 30th, 2002, 08:57 AM
#21
Inactive Member
No i do not use standalone mode mainly because as annoying as they are, i still like to see CEL's come on when something is going screwy.
I've had really good results without the standalone mode, so i dont see myself running it since i'm basically done with this project.
i've run this PMS setup for about a year now.
no problems yet. People just need to understand that tuning it is not going to be completed overnight as it can be very precise.
I'd say with my tuning followed by lawrence's tuning...i've only spent about 3 hours and 10 runs on the dyno.
------------------
daily driven 96 turbo gsr hitting 11s. 315WHP 225WTQ on 91 octane pump gas and 15.5 PSI.
JRSC is garbage. I speak from experience.
-
January 31st, 2002, 05:37 AM
#22
Inactive Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by TrustGs-R:
I'd say with my tuning followed by lawrence's tuning...i've only spent about 3 hours and 10 runs on the dyno.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
is lawrence the dyno spot tuner thats really good at tuning honda's with the PMS or just one of the tuners there?
------------------
-
January 31st, 2002, 10:46 PM
#23
Inactive Member
He learned to use the PMS when I first took my car to tune on their dyno. I showed him the basic tables and such. He's best with Hondata programming.
He's a very good Honda tuner though. Especially integras.
------------------
daily driven 96 turbo gsr hitting 11s. 315WHP 225WTQ on 91 octane pump gas and 15.5 PSI.
JRSC is garbage. I speak from experience.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks